Thursday, July 30, 2009

We are now far into the 6th month of a domestic coup d'etat that has taken over America.

Under the operation of an illigitimate administration, the agitation has not only, not ceased, but has constantly augmented.

In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand."

I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free.

I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided.

It will become all one thing or all the other.

Either the opponents of fascism, socialism, slavery & entitlements, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new -- North as well as South.

Have we no tendency for self reliance and freedom?

Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination -- piece of machinery so to speak -- compounded by the Chicago Czar regime, new powers & authorizations given to the Federal Reserve, the previous TARP reaction to bank failures. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted; but also, let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidence of design and concert of action, among its chief architects, from the beginning.

Make note of the 10 planks of communism:
1. Application of property taxes and rents for the public purpose
2. Progressive income tax
3. Confiscation of inheritance
4. Confiscation of property of non-conformists
5. Establishment of a Central Bank credit monopoly
6. Federal regulation of communication and major transportation
7. Government purchase/ownership of the means of production
8. Distribution of wealth and liability attributable to labor
9. Government zoning of Agriculture and Industry
10. Free education in government schools

Have we so buried the constitution in a web of unnecessary legislation & judicial precedence that we can't realize or remember that the U.S. Constitution, as originally written, prohibits all 10 at the Federal level.

Who but the oligarchy of banks & big business corrupting & perverting the men & women of the administrative, legislative & judicial branches, sent to Washington to protect the states and the people of those states from just such an enemy.

Perhaps the term, "sacred right of self government," was misused in our past to enslave other men, but now these same types of men would have you believe that their "affirmative actions", their "social justice", "economic justice" would enslave the same men & women set free in that era. We in fact do have a sacred right of self government, and it has never extended us the right to control or govern others. Not a man, woman, child and not a people or state.

We teach our children enterprise with a lemonade stand, but fail to see how our lack of constitutional resolve has crippled our ability to take on the same enterprise as adults. The local & federal regulators, licensing bureaus, taxes & insurance mandates would take 9 cents out of every 10 before you mixed up the first pitcher.

In September 2008, a massive run on the federal bank was experienced to the tune of over $500B and a decision to stop the run was made by the Bush administration. The players at the Fed & the treasury encouraged a decision to redirect another $700B into the banking system. This was the first point won, to create an international crisis that allowed an Oligarchy to manipulate public money at the highest levels.

We teach our children democracy and send them to foriegn shores to spread & defend it, but we allow a candidate to remain unvetted through to inauguration and marginalize any outcries through the media.

Before the last Presidential election, a law case came to, and was NOT argued in, the Supreme Court of the United States; but the decision of it was deferred until -- after the election? Indefinitely? Still, before the election, Senator Obama, admitted his dual citizenship assuming that the common man would not realize the violation of eligibility as defined by the constitution. He denied his association with the communist agenda and marginalized those who wanted the honest debate between Socialism & Self Soverignty. He's sealed up all of his personal history that might allow his eligibility case to be heard by the Supreme Court. His personal actions have created an army of unsuspecting to become culpable in the conspiracy.

The election came. Mr. Obama was elected, and the presidency, such as it was, secured. That was the second point gained. The indorsement, however, fell short of a clear popular majority by rumors & accusations of voter fraud at all levels by hired foot soldiers in the form of Acorn & SEIU as well as unsuspecting paid workers, and so, perhaps, was not overwhelmingly reliable and satisfactory.

The Supreme Court has still not met nor able to review the eligiblity, but continues to waffle and refuses to call for the evidence of eligibility and force an argument.

The new President, seizes the early occasion of the TARP decision, the international banking crisis, and his overwhelming popularity to endorse financial paybacks as an economic solution and redirects an additional $700B of public money & debt. Pre-planned legislation is quickly pushed through to strengthen his committment to the 10 planks of communism and he doesn't stop until his energy tax gets stalled in Senate committee & his Public health speeches start falling on deaf ears.

Auxiliary to all this, and working hand in hand with it, the ongoing distortion of equality & civil rights that mandates we care more for others than we do for ourselves, is to educate and mold public opinion, at least Socialist public opinion, not to care whether individual rights are protected or ensured, but that the individual is subject to the will & desires & needs of the "public". This shows exactly where we now are; and partially, also, whither we are tending.

It will throw additional light on the latter, to go back, and run the mind over the string of historical facts already stated. Several things will now appear less dark and mysterious than they did when they were transpiring. The people were to be left "perfectly free," subject only to the Constitution. What the Constitution had to do with it, outsiders could not then see. Plainly enough now, it was an exactly fitted niche, for the Health Care & Cap and Trade decisions to come in, and declare the perfect free freedom of the people to be just no freedom at all.

We cannot absolutely know that all these exact adaptations are the result of preconcert. But when we see a lot of framed timbers, different portions of which we know have been gotten out at different times and places, and by different workmen- Wilson, Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, Carter, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama, for instance-and when we see these timbers joined together, and see they exactly matte the frame of a house with pieces exactly fitting, and all the lengths and proportions of the different pieces adapted to their respective places, and we see the frame prepared yet to lay another such piece in such a case we find it impossible not to believe that since Wilson at least, and incentives & reasons given to all who followed, there is an understanding passed one to the other and all have worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the first blow was struck. Is this a conspiracy theory or a nation watching a new house being built in the ashes of what once stood?

Obama holds, we know, that a man may rightfully be wiser today than he was yesterday-that he may rightfully change when he finds himself wrong. But can we, for that reason, run ahead, and infer that he will make any particular change, of which he, himself, has given no intimation? Can we safely base our action upon any such vague inference? Now, as ever, I wish not to misrepresent Obama's position, albeit I believe ill gained, but clearly, he is not now with us-he does not pretend to be-he does not promise ever to be. Should we not maintain that we the people of a given State, as well as a Territory, were to be left "perfectly free," "subject only to the Constitution?"

Our cause, then, must be intrusted to, and conducted by, its own undoubted friends-those whose hands are free, whose hearts are in the work-who do care for the result. Ten years ago the Republicans of the nation mustered as a party and pushed back the advance of the Clinton administration to a similar end. We did this under the single impulse of resistance to a common danger, with every external circumstance against us. Of strange, discordant, and even hostile elements, we gathered from the four winds, and formed and fought the battle through, under the constant hot fire of a disciplined, proud, and pampered enemy. Did we brave all them to falter now?-now, when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered, and belligerent? The result is not doubtful. We shall not fail-if we stand firm, we shall not fail. Wise counsels may accelerate, or mistakes delay it, but, sooner or later, the victory is sure to come.

Can we count on the Republican party or have they moved too progressively or passively into the same frame of Communism that the Democratic party has begun, so many administrations before? I don't know the answer, I don't know if the party politic is up to this battle. Is there time in this administration to take a stand? Will the Supreme Court assist in the fight to restore the authority of the constitution or have they been given a porch to build onto this new house? Will rule of law prevail, or has corruption rotted the very foundation of our house? There is only one question with our new wisdom that we, as an American people should ask.

Do we have a soviergn right to self governement as individuals that trumps the desires of the public, if the individual does not infringe upon another, or behave as a burden or a nuisance to the public? Does the collective desire of the majority trump and trample the rights of the individual? You must answer the question and if answered in the positive, you can not remain nuetral or idle.

Taken from Lincoln's House Divided Speech. The manifesto was seen on my buddies web site who said he first saw it at FDR all over again blog -

No comments: